Domingo
Domingo v. Saul
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20213:19-cv-01522-RBMCalifornia2,592 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
□
oo
. TI UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA oe . ~ || DESIREE D., Case No.: 3:19-cv-01522-RBM Plaintitt, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 || Vv. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of _ PURSUANT ve el. S.C. 406(b) Social Security, Defendant. . □
[Doc. 24] . I. INTRODUCTION On January 26, 2021, counsel for Desiree D. (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for attorney pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Doc. 24.) The Commissioner of Social Security 21 || (“Defendant”) filed a response on February 9, 2021. (Doc. 25.) For the reasons set forth 22 || below, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Il. BACKGROUND Plaintiff…