Bertrand

Bertrand v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20213:21-cv-00771California1,992 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COREY BERTRAND, Case No.: 21cv0771 GPC (RBM)

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, submitted a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and paid the $5.00 filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) The Court DISMISSES the case without prejudice. FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM The Petition must be dismissed under Rules 2(c) and 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases because Petitioner has failed to articulate any grounds for relief and has failed to allege that he is in custody pursuant to a state court conviction or sentence which violates the Constitution of the United States. Title 28, United States Code, § 2254(a), sets forth the following scope of review for federal habeas corpus claims: The Supreme Court, a Justice thereof, a circuit judge, or a district court shall entertain an application for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.