Elizondo
Elizondo v. Seaworld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Artemisa ELIZONDO, Case No.: 20-cv-00829-GPC-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION TO STRIKE
SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al., 15 Defendant. [ECF No. 29]
17 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Strike Expert Opinions, which 18 was filed before District Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on April 19, 2021. (See ECF No. 29.) 19 Since this matter involves an alleged discovery dispute, the motion was referred to 20 Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal. 21 In its Motion to Strike, Defendant claimed that Plaintiff had not served any expert 22 designations or disclosures pursuant to the Scheduling Order and the Federal Rules of Civil 23 Procedure. (ECF No. 29-1 at 3.) Defendant argued that it is inexcusable that Plaintiff 24 failed to meet the deadlines regarding expert discovery that were listed in the Court’s 25
27 1 Defendant indicated that it served its expert witness designations on December 21, 2020 and served its 28…