Salinas v. LFS Development, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20213:21-cv-00298California791 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GILBERT SALINAS, Case No.: 3:21-cv-298-CAB-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING

v. CASE TO STATE COURT LFS DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Defendant. 14 15 The original complaint in this action, filed in state court, asserted one claim under federal law for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), along with a claim for violation of California’s Unruh Act. [Doc. No. 1-2.] Defendant LFS Development, LLC removed the action to this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) based on the existence of a federal question (the ADA claim) and supplemental jurisdiction over the state claims. [Doc. No. 1.] Defendant subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. [Doc. No. 10.] On April 23, 2021, Plaintiff amended his complaint in response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss. [Doc. No. 11.] Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) drops the ADA claim and instead…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.