Candelario
Candelario v. Amerilist, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAY CANDELARIO, individually and on Case No.: 3:21-cv-586-JLS (JLB) behalf of all others similarly situated,
ORDER SUA SPONTE STRIKING
Plaintiff, LETTER vs. 14 AMERILIST, INC., (ECF No. 4) 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Presently before the Court is a letter from Ravi Backerdan and various exhibits (“Letter,” ECF No. 4). Mr. Backerdan, who appears to be an officer of Defendant Amerilist, Inc., states that “We cannot afford counsel at this time. Please accept this as our answer to the complaint.” Letter at 1. For the reasons stated below, the Court declines to construe the filing as Defendant’s answer and STRIKES the filing. As an initial matter, pursuant to this District’s Local Rules: /// /// /// /// Only natural persons representing their individual interests in propia persona may appear in court without representation by an 2 attorney permitted to practice pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.3. All other…