Anh Van Thai v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20213:15-cv-00583California1,643 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

25 On October 7, 2020, Plaintiff Anh Van Thai filed a Motion for Leave to Amend 26 Class Action Complaint. (ECF No. 172). 27 28 On December 22, 2020, the Court issued an Order granting the Motion for Leave to Amend Class Action Complaint. (ECF No. 179). The Court stated, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Amend Class Action Complaint (ECF No. 172) is granted. Plaintiffs shall file the proposed fourth 4 amended complaint attached as Exhibit A to the Motion (ECF No. 172-1) within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.

6 (Id. at 6). 7 On February 19, 2021, Plaintiffs Anh Van Thai, Don Doan, Tommy Nguyen, and 8 Roes 1 through 100 filed a Fourth Amended Class Action Complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 9 180). Plaintiffs also filed a duplicate FAC. (ECF No. 181). 10 On March 5, 2021, Defendants William Villasenor and Dulce Sanchez filed a 11 Motion to Strike Fourth Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 182). Defendants move to strike 12 the FAC on the grounds it was filed untimely in violation of the Court’s December 22, 13 2020, Order. Defendants further move for sanctions against Plaintiffs and/or their counsel. 14 On March 9, 2021,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.