Bennett

Bennett v. Cielo Homeowners Association, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20213:19-cv-02131California2,582 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAMELA BENNETT; and Case No.: 19-cv-2131-WQH-BLM

JAMES BENNETT,

ORDER

Plaintiffs, 13 v.

CIELO HOMEOWNERS

ASSOCIATION, INC.; THE

JUDGE LAW FIRM—A LAW

CORPORATION; JAMES

JUDGE; DAVID MANGIKYAN;

and DOES 1-10 inclusive, Defendants. HAYES, Judge: The matters before the Court are the Motion for Findings (ECF No. 55), the Motion to Vacate Judgment (ECF No. 56), and the Motion to Exclude Evidence (ECF No. 57) filed by Plaintiffs Pamela Bennett and James Bennett. I. BACKGROUND On November 6, 2019, Plaintiffs Pamela Bennett and James Bennett, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint against Defendants Cielo Homeowners Association, Inc. (“Cielo”), The Judge Law Firm (“TJLF”), TJLF attorney James Judge, TJLF attorney David Mangikyan, and Does 1 through 10. (ECF No. 1). On December 18, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), alleging claims against Defendants for fraud and for violations of the Fair Debt Collection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.