Bennett
Bennett v. Cielo Homeowners Association, Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAMELA BENNETT; and Case No.: 19-cv-2131-WQH-BLM
JAMES BENNETT,
ORDER
Plaintiffs, 13 v.
CIELO HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.; THE
JUDGE LAW FIRM—A LAW
CORPORATION; JAMES
JUDGE; DAVID MANGIKYAN;
and DOES 1-10 inclusive, Defendants. HAYES, Judge: The matters before the Court are the Motion for Findings (ECF No. 55), the Motion to Vacate Judgment (ECF No. 56), and the Motion to Exclude Evidence (ECF No. 57) filed by Plaintiffs Pamela Bennett and James Bennett. I. BACKGROUND On November 6, 2019, Plaintiffs Pamela Bennett and James Bennett, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint against Defendants Cielo Homeowners Association, Inc. (“Cielo”), The Judge Law Firm (“TJLF”), TJLF attorney James Judge, TJLF attorney David Mangikyan, and Does 1 through 10. (ECF No. 1). On December 18, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), alleging claims against Defendants for fraud and for violations of the Fair Debt Collection…