A.N.M.L.

A.N.M.L. v. Barr

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20213:19-cv-01980California1,958 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13 A.N.M.L., Case No. 19-cv-01980-BAS-BGS 14 Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

AS MOOT

v. 16 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 17 General of the United States, et al., 18 Respondents. 19 Petitioner ANML, a minor child, filed this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against various government officials seeking release from immigration custody. (ECF No. 1.) Shortly thereafter, the Government released ANML. The parties then briefed whether there are any issues remaining for the Court to resolve. Having considered the parties’ arguments, the Court concludes this action is moot and dismisses it without prejudice for the following reasons.

The Court substitutes Attorney General Merrick B. Garland and Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas in place of the former officials. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d)(1). 28 I. BACKGROUND A. ANML’s Detention and Claims Petitioner ANML filed a Verified Emergency Petition for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.