Van Osten v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20213:19-cv-02106California4,185 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENISE VAN OSTEN, Case No.: 19CV2106 TWR (BGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION

HOME DEPOT, U.S.A., INC.,

FOR RECONSIDERATION

Defendant. (2) TO SEAL IDENTIFIED

FILINGS

[ECF 75] 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Denise Van Osten has filed “Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider re: Objection to Magistrates Order and Magistrate’s Order Re Plaintiff’s Deposition” (hereinafter “Motion for Reconsideration”). (ECF 75.) The Court set a deadline for Defendant Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. to file a response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF 76.) Defendant timely filed an Opposition to it with evidentiary objections to the declaration submitted in support of the Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF 77 (Opposition), 78 (Evidentiary Objections.) Plaintiff then filed a Reply to which Defendant Objected. (ECF 79…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.