Cathey

Cathey v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20213:19-cv-00275California4,550 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VIVIAN OMILIA CATHEY Case No.: 19-CV-275-GPC(WVG)

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION ON CROSS-

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

JUDGMENT

Social Security, 15 Defendant. [Doc. Nos. 18, 20.]

17 This is an action for judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff Vivian Cathey supplemental security income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”) and Social Security Disability Insurance under Title II of the Act. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the matter is before the undersigned Magistrate Judge for preparation of a Report and Recommendation. For the reasons stated below, the Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be DENIED and Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment be GRANTED. I. OVERVIEW OF SOCIAL SECURITY CLAIM PROCEEDINGS Pursuant to the Social…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.