Welch

Welch v. Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20213:21-cv-00504California581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAND WELCH, Case No.: 21cv504-CAB-BLM

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITION

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST

WARDEN LOUIS WILLIAMS,

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

Respondents. 16 On March 22, 2021, Petitioner Brand Welch filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2241, challenging the calculation of good time credits. [Doc. No. 1.] On April 16, 2021, the government filed a response in opposition to the petition. [Doc. No. 4.] To date, no reply has been filed. Petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Federal prisoners must exhaust the administrative remedies offered by the BOP before seeking § 2241 habeas relief. Ward v. Chavez, 678 F.3d 1042, 1045 (9th Cir. 2021); Garza v. Davis, 596 F.3d 1198, 1203-04 (10th Cir. 2010)(“BOP regulations require a prisoner to attempt informal resolution of a complaint and, if that fails, to submit a formal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.