Musgrove

Musgrove v. Hanifin

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20213:20-cv-00614California4,621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 IRVIN MUSGROVE, Case No.: 20-cv-00614-GPC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING THE FIFTH

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT

ANGIE HANIFIN, SUSANA SOTO, TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

MARGERY PIERCE, KEYSA

MACHADO, AND OCEANSIDE

[ECF No. 49.] HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendants. 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and for the reasons that follow, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Fifth Amended Complaint. Plaintiff will be granted one additional opportunity to file a further amended complaint. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 31, 2020 Plaintiff Irvin Musgrove, proceeding pro se, initiated this action. ECF No. 1. On the same day, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 2. On June 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint naming Angie Hanifin, Susana Soto, Margery Pierce, Keysa Machado, and Oceanside…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.