Musgrove
Musgrove v. Hanifin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 IRVIN MUSGROVE, Case No.: 20-cv-00614-GPC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING THE FIFTH
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT
WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT
ANGIE HANIFIN, SUSANA SOTO, TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
MARGERY PIERCE, KEYSA
MACHADO, AND OCEANSIDE
[ECF No. 49.] HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendants. 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and for the reasons that follow, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Fifth Amended Complaint. Plaintiff will be granted one additional opportunity to file a further amended complaint. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 31, 2020 Plaintiff Irvin Musgrove, proceeding pro se, initiated this action. ECF No. 1. On the same day, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 2. On June 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint naming Angie Hanifin, Susana Soto, Margery Pierce, Keysa Machado, and Oceanside…