Wilson

Wilson v. Wells Fargo & Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20213:20-cv-02307California2,709 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOSANTHONY WILSON, individually, Case No.: 20-cv-2307-DMS-WVG and on behalf of all others similarly 12 situated, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL Plaintiff,

ARBITRATION

14 v.

WELLS FARGO & CO.; WELLS

FARGO BANK, N.A.; and DOES

through 5, inclusive,

Defendants.

19 Pending before the Court is Defendants Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (collectively “Wells Fargo” or “Defendant”) motion to compel arbitration. Plaintiff Mosanthony Wilson filed an opposition to the motion, and Defendant filed a reply. For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion and stays further proceedings pending arbitration. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a customer of Wells Fargo, a nationally chartered bank headquartered in San Francisco, California. (Compl., ECF No. 1, ¶ 23.) Under Federal Reserve regulations, a bank must disclose its overdraft policies…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.