Wilson
Wilson v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOSANTHONY WILSON, individually, Case No.: 20-cv-2307-DMS-WVG and on behalf of all others similarly 12 situated, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL Plaintiff,
ARBITRATION
14 v.
WELLS FARGO & CO.; WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A.; and DOES
through 5, inclusive,
Defendants.
19 Pending before the Court is Defendants Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (collectively “Wells Fargo” or “Defendant”) motion to compel arbitration. Plaintiff Mosanthony Wilson filed an opposition to the motion, and Defendant filed a reply. For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion and stays further proceedings pending arbitration. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a customer of Wells Fargo, a nationally chartered bank headquartered in San Francisco, California. (Compl., ECF No. 1, ¶ 23.) Under Federal Reserve regulations, a bank must disclose its overdraft policies…