Anderson

Anderson v. San Diego Sheriff's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20213:20-cv-02438California482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ANDERSON, Case No. 20cv2438-MMA-RBM Booking #20924254,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; vs. 14 [Doc. No. 2]

SAN DIEGO SHERIFF’S OFFICE;

GEORGE BAILEY DETENTION

DISMISSING CLAIMS AND

FACILITY; A. APEZ; OFFICER 4;

DEFENDANTS FOR FAILING TO

MICHAEL R. BARNETT; OFFICER

STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO McDONALD, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) AND Defendants. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 19 20 21 Michael Anderson (“Plaintiff”), while incarcerated at the San Diego County Sheriff Department’s George Bailey Detention Facility (“GBDF”) in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 14, 2020. See Compl., Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff did not pay the fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.