(HC)Royal

(HC)Royal v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20213:21-cv-00834California1,921 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARLIN LATTERAL ROYAL, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00834-WQH-WVG

Petitioner, (1) ORDER DISMISSING CASE v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

RAYMOND MADDEN,1 Warden, (2) NOTICE OF OPTIONS DUE TO Respondent. FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE

COURT REMEDIES

17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas 18 Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

FAILURE TO SATISFY THE FILING FEE REQUIREMENT

20 Petitioner has failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee and has failed to move to proceed in 21 forma pauperis. This Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the $5.00 filing 22 fee or qualified to proceed in forma pauperis. See Rule 3(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. 23 / / / 24

26 1 Petitioner named “Warden” as Respondent and indicates he is incarcerated at Centinela State Prison, located in Imperial, CA. The Warden of Centinela State Prison is Raymond Madden. See https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/facility-locator/cen/ (last visited…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.