Booth
Booth v. Curiel
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAMMY MAE BOOTH, Case No. 21-cv-00469-BAS-RBB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING THE
v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS
BY DEFENDANTS MARK D.
GONZALO P. CURIEL, et al.,
FEINBERG, JEAN M. HEINZ,
Defendants. HEINZ & FEINBERG ATTORNEYS AT LAW (ECF No. 3)
17 18 19 On March 17, 2021, Plaintiff Tammy Mae Booth filed this action against Defendants Mark D. Feinberg, Jean M. Heinz, Heinz & Feinberg Attorneys at Law (“H&F Defendants”), and United States District Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. (ECF No. 1.) On April 7, 2021, the H&F Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, noticing May 17, 2021, as the hearing date. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff’s deadline to file the opposition was May 3, 2021. Civ. L.R. 7.1(e). No opposition was filed. Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(2) provides that a party opposing a motion must file either an opposition or…