Wilborn
Wilborn v. Wolf
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAROLD L. WILBORN Case No.: 20cv1981-LAB (BGS)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. EX PARTE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE JUDGMENT ON
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
THE PLEADINGS
Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Harold Wilborn submitted a document for filing, captioned as follows: “Plaintiff’s Request (Motion) for Judicial Notice, Joint Motion(s), (1) Constitutional Violation of Fifth Amendment Under Title VII. (2) Motion for Judgment on the Pleading 12(c).” [sic] Most of the document consists of citations and legal arguments strung together. It also improperly seeks to bring renewed requests for reconsideration of scheduling and procedural issues that have no effect on the outcome of this case, and for which reconsideration was already denied. However, it appears Wilborn is also trying to file a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court therefore construes this document as an ex parte motion for leave…