Finjan LLC v. ESET, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FINJAN, INC., Case No.: 3:17-cv-0183-CAB-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
v. FOR RECONSIDERATION [Doc. No. 872] ESET, LLC, a California Limited Liability and ESET SPOL. S.R.O., a Slovak 13 Republic Corporation, 14 Defendants.
16 On March 29, 2021, the Court granted a motion for summary judgment brought by 17 defendants ESET, LLC and ESET SPOL, S.R.O. (jointly “ESET”) invalidating plaintiff 18 Finjan LLC’s patents based on indefiniteness. [Doc. No. 869.] Finjan filed a motion for 19 reconsideration of that order on April 12, 2021. [Doc. No. 872.] The time for submitting a 20 response to the motion has expired, and ESET has elected not to file an opposition. The 21 Court finds the motion suitable for determination without argument. The motion for 22 reconsideration is denied. 23 A district court may reconsider its grant of summary judgment under either Federal 24 Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (motion to alter or amend a judgment) or Rule 60(b) (relief…