Carr

Carr v. McDowell

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20213:21-cv-00900California2,122 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL D. CARR, Case No.: 21cv0900 MMA (MSB)

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS;

NEIL McDOWELL, Warden, et al.,

Respondents. [Doc. No. 2]

DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

PREJUDICE AND WITH LEAVE TO

AMEND

18 19 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Doc. No. 1. The Petition is subject to dismissal because Petitioner has failed satisfy the filing fee requirement and because Petitioner indicates he has not exhausted state court remedies as to any of the claims in the Petition. FILING FEE REQUIREMENT Petitioner has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) together with a trust account statement which reflects a $6.40 balance in his prison trust account at the California correctional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.