Potts
Potts v. Ford Motor Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
FILED ©
MAY 2° 2021
SREP □□
BY DEPUT
4 5 6 . UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 il RACHEL POTTS and JAMIKO REI Case No.: 3:21-cv-00256-BEN-BGS ORDER: Plaintiffs, @) DENYING MOTION TO Vv. REMAND AND || FORD MOTOR COMPANY; (2) GRANTING MOTIONS TO
CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES DISMISS
16 || CALIFORNIA LLC; and DOES 1 17 || through 10, [ECF Nos. 4, 5, 10, 11] Defendants. Plaintiffs Rachel Potts and Jamiko Rei Bell (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are suing 20 || Defendants Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), CarMax Auto Superstores California LLC 21 || “CarMax”, and when referred to collectively with Ford, “Defendants”), and ten unnamed 22 || defendants for state law violations alleging (1) breach of an express warranty, Cal. Civ. 23 || Code § 1793.2(d)(1) (“Section 1793.2(d)(1)”), (2) failure to complete repairs within thirty…