Karpe

Karpe v. Chao

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20213:18-cv-02521California728 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KEVIN KARPE, Case No.: 18-cv-2521-DMS-NLS

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART

v. THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION TO

VACATE PRETRIAL DEADLINES,

PETER P.M. BUTTIGIEG, Secretary, (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S and DEPARTMENT OF COUNSEL’S MOTION TO

TRANSPORTATION (FAA),

WITHDRAW, AND (3) SETTING AN

14 Defendants. AMENDED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and to Strike. (ECF No. 35.) Plaintiff failed to file a brief in opposition to Defendant’s motion. Defendant filed a reply in support of the unopposed motion. (ECF No. 37.) Also pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s counsel’s Motion to Withdraw without Substitution. (ECF No. 39.) The Court held a telephonic status conference on the present matter on May 14, 2021. (See ECF No. 39.) One week later, on May 21, 2021, the parties filed a joint status update informing the Court that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.