Salmen

Salmen v. Hodges

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20213:21-cv-00966California1,006 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN SALMEN, Case No.: 3:21-cv-0966-JLS-DEB

CDCR #BK-5881,

ORDER (1) DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. vs. § 1915A(b)(1) AND (2) DENYING

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

J. HODGES, Chief Physician,

PAUPERIS AS MOOT Defendant. 16 (ECF No. 2) 17 18 19 Plaintiff Justin Salmen, currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) located in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). I. Sua Sponte Screening Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, obligates the Court to review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.