Navarro

Williams v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20213:18-cv-01581California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 18cv1581-TWR-(KSC)

CDCR #AG-2394,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, EX PARTE MOTION FOR v. RECONSIDERATION

O. NAVARRO; E. ESTRADA; J. MEJIA;

15 and A. SILVA, 16 Defendants. [Doc. No. 104.] 17 Before the Court is plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion, which the Court initially construed as a Renewed Motion to Compel. [Doc. No. 104.] However, in effect, plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion seeks reconsideration of the Court’s March 19, 2021 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. [Doc. No. 104, referring to Doc. No. 97.] Plaintiff argues that the Court should issue an order requiring defendants to produce documents responsive to his Document Request Nos. 8 and 13 (Set One). The Court’s March 19, 2021 Order denied plaintiff’s request for an order requiring defendants to produce any further documents responsive to Document Request Nos. 8 and 13. [Doc. No. 97, at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.