Navarro
Williams v. Navarro
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 18cv1581-TWR-(KSC)
CDCR #AG-2394,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
Plaintiff, EX PARTE MOTION FOR v. RECONSIDERATION
O. NAVARRO; E. ESTRADA; J. MEJIA;
15 and A. SILVA, 16 Defendants. [Doc. No. 104.] 17 Before the Court is plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion, which the Court initially construed as a Renewed Motion to Compel. [Doc. No. 104.] However, in effect, plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion seeks reconsideration of the Court’s March 19, 2021 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. [Doc. No. 104, referring to Doc. No. 97.] Plaintiff argues that the Court should issue an order requiring defendants to produce documents responsive to his Document Request Nos. 8 and 13 (Set One). The Court’s March 19, 2021 Order denied plaintiff’s request for an order requiring defendants to produce any further documents responsive to Document Request Nos. 8 and 13. [Doc. No. 97, at…