Hastings

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAVID HASTINGS, Case No.: 19cv2217-BAS-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

REIMBURSEMENT OF

FORD MOTOR COMPANY and

REASONABLE FEES INCURRED

FORD OF CHULA VISTA,

IN OPPOSING PLAINTIFF’S Defendants. MOTION TO COMPEL

16 [ECF No. 86] 17 Before the Court is Defendants’ request for attorneys’ fees expended to oppose Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 63). (ECF No. 86). Plaintiff does not oppose the motion and agrees to pay the requested fees totaling $10,946. (ECF No. 90). RELEVANT BACKGROUND On April 2, 2021, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to compel regarding twelve requests for production (“RFPs”). (ECF No. 73). The Court found that Plaintiff failed to specifically address the RFPs at issue, was not entitled to discovery relevant only to damages under the Song-Beverly Act, Defendants. (See generally, id.). The Court ordered…