Rodriguez
Rodriguez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 21cv236 DMS (LL)
Plaintiff,
ORDER(1) DENYING MOTION TO
v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND (2) DISMISSING CASE
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; JOHN
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
RICHARD SHREWSBERRY;
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER AND
HAMPTON, LLP; JOHN C. DINEEN, Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has submitted a Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The Court is unable to determine whether Plaintiff is unable to pay the costs of this case because he failed to answer all of the questions on the form motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP is DENIED and the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Pursuant to this Order, Plaintiff is granted 30 days leave to pay the $402 filing fee required to maintain this action / / / / / / / / / ||pursuant to U.S.C. § 1914, or to submit …