Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Bad Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20213:21-cv-00236California360 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 21cv236 DMS (LL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER(1) DENYING MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND (2) DISMISSING CASE

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; JOHN

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

RICHARD SHREWSBERRY;

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER AND

HAMPTON, LLP; JOHN C. DINEEN, Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has submitted a Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The Court is unable to determine whether Plaintiff is unable to pay the costs of this case because he failed to answer all of the questions on the form motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP is DENIED and the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Pursuant to this Order, Plaintiff is granted 30 days leave to pay the $402 filing fee required to maintain this action / / / / / / / / / ||pursuant to U.S.C. § 1914, or to submit …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.