Ploesser

Ploesser v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20213:20-cv-02511California1,658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARKUS PLOESSER, M.D., an ) Case No.: 3:20-cv-02511-BEN-LL individual, ) 12 ) ORDER GRANTING JOINT Plaintiff, ) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE v. ) AMENDED COMPLAINT ADDING 14 ) ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT

CITY OF SAN DIEGO; MICHAEL

) RAGSAC; and DOES 1-10, ) [ECF No. 14] 16 Defendant. ) 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Markus Ploesser, M.D., an individual (“Plaintiff” or “Dr. Ploesser”), brings this action against Defendants the City of San Diego; Michael Ragsac; and Does 1 through 10, for alleged violations of his constitutional rights when he was arrested on March 9, 2020, despite passing all field sobriety tests. ECF No. 1. Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint Adding an Additional Defendant (the “Joint Motion”). ECF No. 14. After considering the papers submitted, supporting documentation, and applicable law, the Court GRANTS the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.