Vader

Vader v. Social Security Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20213:19-cv-00703-AHGCalifornia7,387 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSE V., Case No.: 3:19-cv-00703-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

Social Security, MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND Defendant. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE 59(E);

18 (2) VACATING ORDER RESOLVING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW,

REVERSING DENIAL OF

BENEFITS, AND REMANDING FOR

PAYMENT OF BENEFITS (ECF NO.

22 24); AND 23 (3) REMANDING ACTION FOR

FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

25 [ECF NOS. 24, 25]

27 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Defendant” or “the Commissioner”) Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (the “Motion for Reconsideration”). ECF No. 24. I. BACKGROUND 6 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.