Vader
Vader v. Social Security Administration
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20213:19-cv-00703-AHGCalifornia7,387 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSE V., Case No.: 3:19-cv-00703-AHG
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
Social Security, MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND Defendant. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO
FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 59(E);
18 (2) VACATING ORDER RESOLVING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW,
REVERSING DENIAL OF
BENEFITS, AND REMANDING FOR
PAYMENT OF BENEFITS (ECF NO.
22 24); AND 23 (3) REMANDING ACTION FOR
FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
25 [ECF NOS. 24, 25]
27 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Defendant” or “the Commissioner”) Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (the “Motion for Reconsideration”). ECF No. 24. I. BACKGROUND 6 …