Sukumar

Sukumar v. International Olympic Committee

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20213:21-cv-00215California3,287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PONANI SUKUMAR, an individual, Case No.: 21cv215-GPC(AGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK

OF SUBJECT MATTER

INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC

JURISDICTION WITHOUT LEAVE

COMMITTEE, an international non- TO AMEND profit, non-governmental organization;

and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, [Dkt. No. 11.) Defendant. 18 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), and 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 11.) Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendant filed a reply. (Dkt. Nos. 16, 18.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) without leave to amend. Background Plaintiff Ponani Sukumar (“Plaintiff” or “Sukumar”) filed a complaint for declaratory relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.