Finegold

Finegold v. Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20213:21-cv-00130California1,297 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GAIL FINEGOLD, Case No. 21-cv-00130-BAS-JLB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION

SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET, INC., Defendant. 15 Before the Court is Defendant’s Response to the Court’s April 2, 2021 Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) regarding subject matter jurisdiction. (ECF No. 7.) The Court’s OSC noted deficiencies in Defendant’s allegations regarding both diversity of citizenship and the amount in controversy. Because Defendant’s allegations regarding the amount in controversy remain deficient, this action is subject to remand.1 In its Response, Defendant reiterates that it has been unable to ascertain the amount in controversy because Plaintiff did not respond to Defendant’s inquiries about the value of the case. Specifically, Defendant represented to Plaintiff that if she stipulated that her damages did not exceed $75,000, Defendant would agree to keep the case in state court. (Decl.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.