Outfront Media LLC v. The City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20213:19-cv-02236California8,239 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OUTFRONT MEDIA, LLC, Case No.: 19cv2236 JM(BGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING CROSS-

v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants. 16 Presently before the court are Outfront Media, LLC’s (“Outfront”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30) and Defendants’ Cross Motions for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication of Issues (Doc. Nos. 31, 32, 33). The motions have been fully briefed and the court finds them suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, Outfront’s motion is denied, and Defendants’ motions are granted-in-part. I. BACKGROUND A. Undisputed Facts The dispute concerns whether a billboard previously located at 1473 F Street, San Diego, California, was inversely condemned because the property on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.