Cluff
Cluff v. United States Customs and Border Protection
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || GARRETT JAMES CLUFF, Case No.: 21cv115-L-LL Plants, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 |] Vv. DISMISS AS MOOT UNITED STATES CUSTOMS. AND □□ □□
Defendants. Pending before the court is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant United States 18 || Customs and Border Protection. [ECF no. 4.] In lieu of opposing the motion, Plaintiff 19 || filed an amended complaint. [ECF no. 5.] Accordingly, motion to dismiss is denied as 20 || moot. See Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). Defendants shall file a response to the amended complaint, if any, no later than the time 22 |! provided for in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED. ||Dated: June 1, 2021 Ny fr fate, ? H . James Lorenz, United States District Judge