Salmen

Salmen v. Barrientos

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20213:21-cv-00818California1,592 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN SALMEN, Case No.: 3:21-cv-0818-CAB-WVG

CDCR #BK-5881,

ORDER DISMISSING FIRST

Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR vs. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) AND 28 U.S.C.

J. BARRIENTOS; MUNOZ; C. § 1915A(b)(1)

TAYLOR; CORTEZ; C. MOORE,

Defendant. 18 19 Plaintiff Justin Salmen (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (See ECF No. 1, Compl. at 1.) The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP and dismissed Plaintiff’s initial Complaint (ECF No. 1) for failure to state claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) and Section 1915A(b) and granted Plaintiff leave to amend. (See ECF No. 5, at 9-10.) Plaintiff timely submitted a First Amended Complaint. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.