Briceno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCUS D. BRICENO Case No.: 3:16-cv-1665 JAH (AGS)

CDCR #AU0333,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, RECONSIDERATION v. [Doc. No. 97]

BLAKE WILLIAMS,

15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Currently before the Court is Defendant Blake Williams’ (“Williams”) Motion for Reconsideration re Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 97.) I. Procedural History On February 20, 2020, Williams filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on qualified immunity grounds as to Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment Excessive Force claims. (See Doc. No. 77.) The Court GRANTED in Part, and DENIED in part, Williams’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (See Doc. No. 96.) Specifically, the Court found that there were “genuine disputes of material fact exist as to whether Williams violated Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights” which is the first prong of the qualified immunity analysis. (Id. at 17.) The Court GRANTED Williams’ qualified immunity with…