Moore

Moore v. Johnson and Johnson Corporate Headquarters

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20213:21-cv-01023California1,563 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BARBARA ANN MOORE, Case No.: 3:21-cv-1023-GPC(WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S DANIEL MOORE, et als.,

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

Defendants. PAUPERIS; [Dkt. No. 2]

(2) SUA SPONTE DISMISSING

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

18 (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL AS MOOT [Dkt. No. 3]

24 On May 28, 2021, Plaintiff Barbara Ann Moore, proceeding pro se, filed a form 25 complaint against Defendants Daniel Moore, San Diego County, Johnson and Johnson 26 Corporate Headquarters (“Johnson and Johnson”), Arnold & Itkin Law Firm, Cox 27 Corporate Headquarters, US Postal Headquarters, GEICO, Esurance Ins., Palmotto GBA, 28 Defense Logistics Agency, Prisoner Transportation Services, and Diane K Morales. (Dkt. No. 1.) She also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and motion for appointment of counsel. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.