Stewart

Stewart v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20213:21-cv-00587California1,450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Lindsey Stewart, Case No.: 21cv587-CAB-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION

v. TO DISMISS [Doc. No. 6]; and (2)

DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO

Chick-Fil-A Inc., REMAND [Doc. No. 9] Defendant. 16 On June 3, 2021, the Court held a hearing regarding Defendant Chick-Fil-A, Inc.’s motion to dismiss the complaint [Doc. No. 6] and Plaintiff’s motion to remand to state court [Doc. No. 9]. Plaintiff Lindsey Stewart, pro se, appeared at the hearing. Barbara Miller, Esq., appeared on behalf of Defendant. For the reasons stated at the hearing and as set forth below, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, and the motion to remand is DENIED AS MOOT. PROCEDURAL HISTORY OF 2019 ACTION On September 17, 2019, Plaintiff Lindsey Stewart (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Danny Putnam, Becky Putnam, 3 Little Cows, Inc., dba Chick- Fil-A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.