Stark

Stark v. Stall

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20213:19-cv-00366California3,732 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLLETTE STARK, ANTON EWING, Case No.: 19-cv-00366-AJB-AHG Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v. STUART STALL’S MOTION TO STUART STALL, et al., DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO 14 Defendant. AMEND 15 (Doc. No. 36) 16 Pending before the Court is Defendant Stuart Stall’s (“Stall”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Anton Ewing’s (“Ewing”) Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). (Doc. No. 36.) Ewing filed an opposition to the motion, (Doc. No. 38), and Stall replied, (Doc. No. 39). The Court found this motion suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). As explained below, the Court GRANTS Stall’s motion to dismiss WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. I. BACKGROUND The following facts are taken from the TAC and accepted as true for the limited purpose of resolving this motion. See Brown v. Elec. Arts, Inc., 724 F.3d 1235, 1247 (9th Cir. 2013). Ewing brings this action against Stall and Defendant US Global (“US Global”) 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.