Rae

Rae v. Anza Healthcare, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20213:21-cv-00287California2,274 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN A. RAE, by and through her Case No.: 21-cv-287-DMS (JLB) successor-in-interest/personal 12 representative, SHANNON ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MONTISANO; SHANNON MOTION TO REMAND MONTISANO, individually; BRENDAN 14 MACRAE, individually; STACEY ADAME, individually; and TODD RAE, individually, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 ANZA HEALTHCARE INC., d/b/a 19 VICTORIA POST ACUTE CARE; and DOES 1–50, Defendants. 22 This case comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion to remand. Defendant Anza Healthcare, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a response in opposition, and Plaintiffs filed a reply. For the following reasons, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion. / / / / / / / / / I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs allege Susan A. Rae was admitted to Defendant’s nursing home facility for physical therapy and occupational therapy on March 14, 2020. (Compl., ECF No. 1-2, ¶ 17.) Rae required…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.