Finnegan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SEAN MATTHEW FINNEGAN, Case No. 21-cv-00782-BAS-DEB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AMTRAK; AMTRAK POLICE

DEPARTMENT,

13 Defendants. 14 On April 20, 2021, Plaintiff Sean Matthew Finnegan, proceeding pro se, commenced this action against Amtrak and the Amtrak Police Department and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) The Court issued an order denying the request, noting that Plaintiff had submitted the incorrect IFP form and instructing him to complete the long form application—a copy of which was mailed to him by the Clerk’s Office—and file it with the Court by May 14, 2021. (ECF No. 3.) The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to timely file the correct IFP form would result in dismissal of his action without prejudice. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed a corrected IFP application, paid the filing fee for this case, or requested an extension of time to do so. “Under 28 U.S.C. §…