Vuz

Vuz v. DCSS III, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20213:20-cv-00246California1,191 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ASHLEY R. VUZ, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00246-GPC-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S EX

PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE

DCSS III, INC. (d/b/a GOSSIP GRILL),

TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER

et al., SEAL Defendants. 16 [ECF No. 121] 17 On June 4, 2021, Plaintiff filed an ex parte application for leave to file under seal documents in connection to the Motion for Settlement Approval and Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) filed by Plaintiff and Defendants DCSS III, Casteel, Rocha, and Wynne (ECF No. 123). ECF No. 121. Specifically, Plaintiff seeks to file the related memorandum of points and authorities and supporting declaration with the settlement amount and amount of an attorney lien redacted, and to file unredacted versions under seal. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s application without prejudice. \ \ \ 27 There is a presumptive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.