Hawkins

Hawkins v. San Diego County

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20213:20-cv-02200California830 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER HAWKINS, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02200-WQH-KSC No. 20912411,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

SAN DIEGO COUNTY, et al., PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) Defendants. AND § 1915A(b) AND FOR FAILING

TO PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE

WITH COURT ORDER REQUIRING AMENDMENT; and

(2) DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE [ECF No. 22] 20 I. Introduction and Procedural Background On November 10, 2020, Plaintiffs Daryl Dunsmore and Christopher Hawkins filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1–2. On February 16, 2021, the Court denied in part the IFP as to Plaintiff Dunsmore pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g) and dismissed the action sua sponte without prejudice as to Plaintiff Dunsmore for failing to prepay the $400 civil and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.