Napper

Napper v. San Diego Sheriff Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20213:21-cv-00359California1,839 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST NAPPER, JR., Case No.: 21-CV-359 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) DENYING MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

14 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S AND (2) DENYING MOTION TO

DEPT.; GEORGE BAILEY APPOINT COUNSEL

16 DETENTION FACILITY; and CORPORAL BADGE #3142, (ECF Nos. 2, 3) Defendants.

Plaintiff Ernest Napper, Jr. (“Plaintiff” or “Napper”), currently incarcerated at George Baily Detention Facility (“GBDF”), has filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing. He has instead filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a). See ECF No. 2 (“IFP Mot.”). Plaintiff has also filed a Motion to Appoint Counsel. See ECF No. 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.