Pilant

Pilant v. Caesars Enterprise Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20213:20-cv-02043California1,071 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DARRELL PILANT, Case No.: 20-CV-2043-CAB-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. VACATE ORDERS

CAESARS ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC, [Doc. No. 36] 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter is before the Court on a motion by Plaintiff for the Court to vacate the following three orders: (1) a December 1, 2020 order on Defendant’s motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 6]; (2) a February 8, 2021 order denying specially appearing Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians’ motion to intervene [Doc. No. 22]; and (3) a March 30, 2021 order denying the Rincon Band’s motion for a stay [Doc. No. 29] (collectively, the “Orders”). The motion is unopposed, and the Court deems it suitable for submission without oral argument. Plaintiff states that as a material term of the parties’ settlement, he agreed to take the steps necessary to have the Court vacate the Orders. The motion cites no binding authority requiring a district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.