Dias
Dias v. Burberry Limited
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LIUBOV DIAS, Case No. 21-cv-192-MMA (JLB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO REMAND AND
GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
BURBERRY LIMITED and BRADLEY
MOTION TO COMPEL
MOORE,
ARBITRATION Defendants. 16 [Doc. Nos. 13, 19] 17 18 Liubov Dias (“Plaintiff”) alleges that Defendants Burberry Limited (“Burberry”) and Bradley Moore (“Moore”) (collectively, “Defendants”) discriminated and retaliated against Plaintiff. See Doc. No. 1-2 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 10, 20. Defendants removed this action from the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1446 and on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. See Doc. No. 1. Two motions are pending before the Court. See Doc. Nos. 13, 19. Defendants move to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act. …