Dias

Dias v. Burberry Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20213:21-cv-00192California12,382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LIUBOV DIAS, Case No. 21-cv-192-MMA (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND AND

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

BURBERRY LIMITED and BRADLEY

MOTION TO COMPEL

MOORE,

ARBITRATION Defendants. 16 [Doc. Nos. 13, 19] 17 18 Liubov Dias (“Plaintiff”) alleges that Defendants Burberry Limited (“Burberry”) and Bradley Moore (“Moore”) (collectively, “Defendants”) discriminated and retaliated against Plaintiff. See Doc. No. 1-2 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 10, 20. Defendants removed this action from the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1446 and on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. See Doc. No. 1. Two motions are pending before the Court. See Doc. Nos. 13, 19. Defendants move to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.