Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20213:19-cv-02098California3,155 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE LUIS BARAJAS CENTENO, Case No.: 19-cv-2098-L (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

CITY OF CARLSBAD, et al.,

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO

Defendants. DISCOVERY REQUESTS

16 [DKT. NO. 115]

18 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion to Compel Defendants to Respond to Discovery Requests and to Obey Subpoenas.” Dkt. No. 115. Although stylized as a motion to compel, Plaintiff’s Motion more accurately requests the Court to re-open fact and expert discovery for Plaintiff to obtain discovery from Defendant the City of Carlsbad (the “City”), Defendants City of Carlsbad Police Officers Jordan Walker and James Gallivan, Defendants’ designated expert, City of Carlsbad Chief of Police Neil Gallucci, and City of Carlsbad Mayor Matt Hall. Id. Defendants agree to reopen discovery for the limited purpose of allowing Plaintiff to take discovery relevant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.