Rashid

Rashid v. BMW of North America, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20213:20-cv-00573California1,860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ASHRAF RASHID, Case No.: 20cv573-L-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v.

GRANTING MOTION FOR

BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC,

RECONSIDERATION [ECF NO. 34],

Defendant. and

GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION AND STAY ACTION [ECF NO. 9.]

19 Pending before the Court in this lemon law action is Defendant’s Motion for 20 Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action. 21 [“Motion”[ECF No. 34.]) Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendant replied. The Court 22 decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 23 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion is granted. 24 On February 23, 2021, the Court issued an order denying Defendant’s Motion to 25 Compel Arbitration and Stay Discovery. (“Motion to Compel” [ECF No. 29.] Defendant 26 filed the current Motion on March 23, 2021, requesting the Court reconsider its prior 27 Order pursuant to Rule 59(e)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.