Pitt

Pitt v. Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20213:20-cv-00694California2,039 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN A. PITT, Individually, as Case No.: 20-cv-00694-BAS (DEB) Successor-In-Interest to MICHAEL A. 12 PITT, Decedent, on Behalf of the Estate of ORDER RE: JOINT MOTION FOR MICHAEL A. PITT, and on Behalf of the DETERMINATION OF DISCOVERY Class, DISPUTE

Plaintiff, DKT. NO. 35 v.

METROPOLITAN TOWER LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

18 Defendant.

20 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute. Dkt. No. 35. At issue is Plaintiff Susan A. Pitt’s Interrogatory No. 18 (“Interrogatory”) seeking, among other things, the identities and contact information of potential class members. Defendant Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company (referred to as “Tower” in the Joint Motion) agreed to provide data for the life insurance policies at issue, but objects to providing policyholders’ names and contact information. Upon 28 consideration of the Joint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.