Elizondo
Elizondo v. Seaworld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTEMIS ELIZONDO, Case No.: 20CV829-GPC(BGS)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
SEAWORLD PARKS &
ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,
[Dkt. No. 28.] Defendant.
17 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 28.) 18 Plaintiff filed an opposition, (Dkt. No. 33), and Defendant replied, (Dkt. No. 35). 19 Based on the reasoning below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion for summary 20 judgment.1 21
23 1In addition to the summary judgment motion, Defendant filed a motion to strike any future expert 24 opinions proffered by Plaintiff because she failed to disclose or designate any experts during discovery. (Dkt. No. 29.) On April 27, 2021, without briefing by the parties, the Magistrate Judge denied the motion to strike as premature since Plaintiff had not yet proffered any expert testimony as evidence. (Dkt. No. 31.) Then, in her opposition to the summary judgment…