Vuz

Vuz v. DCSS III, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20213:20-cv-00246California1,336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ASHLEY R. VUZ, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00246-GPC-AGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. RENEWED EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO

DCSS III, INC. (d/b/a GOSSIP GRILL),

FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

et al., 15 Defendants. [ECF No. 125] 16 17 On June 14, 2021, following the Court’s order denying without prejudice Plaintiff’s previous motion to seal (ECF No. 124), Plaintiff filed a renewed ex parte application for leave to file under seal documents in connection to the Motion for Settlement Approval and Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) filed by Plaintiff and Defendants DCSS III, Casteel, Rocha, and Wynne (ECF No. 126). ECF No. 125. Plaintiff seeks to file the related memorandum of points and authorities and supporting declaration with the settlement amount and amount of an attorney lien redacted, and to file unredacted versions under seal. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s application. 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.