Gaytan

Gaytan v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20213:20-cv-00153California2,733 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HUGO G., Case No.: 20cv153-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND GRANTING

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION

Social Security, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. 15 [ECF Nos. 15, 16] 16 Hugo G. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final administrative decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff’s application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”) and for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Act. (AR at 15). For the reasons expressed herein, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 15] and GRANTS the Commissioner’s cross motion for summary

26 1 “AR” refers to the Certified Administrative Record filed on November…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.