Mahil
Mahil v. Option Care Enterprises, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HARJIT MAHIL, Case No.: 20cv1559-BEN-MDD
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
v. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO
COMPEL PRODUCTION OF
OPTION CARE ENTERPRISES, PLAINTIFF'S UNREDACTED
INC.,
MEDICAL RECORDS Defendants. 15 [ECF No. 21]
17 Before the Court is a discovery dispute motion brought by Option Care Enterprises, Inc. (“Defendant”) seeking production of Harjit Mahil’s (“Plaintiff”) unredacted medical records. (ECF No. 21). Plaintiff argues production is not warranted because the redacted information is irrelevant and privileged. (Id.). For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that Plaintiff has not met her burden of “clarifying, explaining, and supporting” her objections based on relevance and privilege. DIRECTV, Inc. v. Trone, 209 F.R.D. 455, 458 (C.D. Cal 2002) (citing Blankenship v. Hearst Corp., 519 F.2d 418, 429 (9th Cir. 1975)). Instead, Plaintiff provides conclusory…