Mahil

Mahil v. Option Care Enterprises, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20213:20-cv-01559California3,299 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HARJIT MAHIL, Case No.: 20cv1559-BEN-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO

COMPEL PRODUCTION OF

OPTION CARE ENTERPRISES, PLAINTIFF'S UNREDACTED

INC.,

MEDICAL RECORDS Defendants. 15 [ECF No. 21]

17 Before the Court is a discovery dispute motion brought by Option Care Enterprises, Inc. (“Defendant”) seeking production of Harjit Mahil’s (“Plaintiff”) unredacted medical records. (ECF No. 21). Plaintiff argues production is not warranted because the redacted information is irrelevant and privileged. (Id.). For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that Plaintiff has not met her burden of “clarifying, explaining, and supporting” her objections based on relevance and privilege. DIRECTV, Inc. v. Trone, 209 F.R.D. 455, 458 (C.D. Cal 2002) (citing Blankenship v. Hearst Corp., 519 F.2d 418, 429 (9th Cir. 1975)). Instead, Plaintiff provides conclusory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.